<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: #ObamaBiden2012? #RomneyRyan2012? #SocialMedia2012.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webpagefx.com/blog/internet/obamabiden2012-romneyryan2012-socialmedia2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webpagefx.com/blog/internet/obamabiden2012-romneyryan2012-socialmedia2012/</link>
	<description>Web design, search engine optimization, leadership and small business advice blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.webpagefx.com/blog/internet/obamabiden2012-romneyryan2012-socialmedia2012/#comment-7473</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpagefx.com/blog/?p=4642#comment-7473</guid>
		<description>I think Twitter can be informative if you follow legitimate news sources, that&#039;s how I keep up with the big headlines! (More so than any other form of news). You&#039;re definitely right about the polarization factor. I follow people who support both candidates, but every time I see a tweet about the candidate that I DON&#039;T support it just strengthens my support of the candidate that I DO support. 


But I&#039;m really strong in my political beliefs. What I&#039;m curious about is how much Twitter (and Facebook) can influence a voter who&#039;s interested in politics and the election, but is also on-the-fence or undecided about who they&#039;re going to vote for. 


Whether or not the tweets are informative or not is kind of irrelevant (sadly). A lot of people make uniformed decisions; they see a tweet or status and they believe it without researching whether or not it&#039;s true. That&#039;s a negative about social media&#039;s role in politics, but I don&#039;t think it takes away from the impact or power the medium holds in our society.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Twitter can be informative if you follow legitimate news sources, that&#8217;s how I keep up with the big headlines! (More so than any other form of news). You&#8217;re definitely right about the polarization factor. I follow people who support both candidates, but every time I see a tweet about the candidate that I DON&#8217;T support it just strengthens my support of the candidate that I DO support. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m really strong in my political beliefs. What I&#8217;m curious about is how much Twitter (and Facebook) can influence a voter who&#8217;s interested in politics and the election, but is also on-the-fence or undecided about who they&#8217;re going to vote for. </p>
<p>Whether or not the tweets are informative or not is kind of irrelevant (sadly). A lot of people make uniformed decisions; they see a tweet or status and they believe it without researching whether or not it&#8217;s true. That&#8217;s a negative about social media&#8217;s role in politics, but I don&#8217;t think it takes away from the impact or power the medium holds in our society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevin</title>
		<link>http://www.webpagefx.com/blog/internet/obamabiden2012-romneyryan2012-socialmedia2012/#comment-7444</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webpagefx.com/blog/?p=4642#comment-7444</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve actually found much of the election conversation on Twitter to be terribly uninformative. The tough thing with Twitter is that it helps further polarize everybody...Pro Obama/Romney people are likely to only follow/share other accounts that share their same views and perspective. It ends up being both sides taking to themselves and a bunch of people making the same jokes. I don&#039;t see anybody changing their opinion from discourse on Twitter, only further strengthening the views that they already have. 

Then again, I don&#039;t like politics to begin with so I might be overly cynical :D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve actually found much of the election conversation on Twitter to be terribly uninformative. The tough thing with Twitter is that it helps further polarize everybody&#8230;Pro Obama/Romney people are likely to only follow/share other accounts that share their same views and perspective. It ends up being both sides taking to themselves and a bunch of people making the same jokes. I don&#8217;t see anybody changing their opinion from discourse on Twitter, only further strengthening the views that they already have. </p>
<p>Then again, I don&#8217;t like politics to begin with so I might be overly cynical <img src='http://webpagefxblog.webpagefx1.netdna-cdn.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Content Delivery Network via webpagefxblog.webpagefx1.netdna-cdn.com

 Served from: www.webpagefx.com @ 2013-05-23 11:15:34 by W3 Total Cache -->